Good vs. Bad Julius Ceasar

In the time of the ruling of Julius Caesar, in all of the Romans loved most of Caesars qualities. He was a levelheaded and popular leader and did a lot for the people. But virtually Romans had a problem with Caesar and political program to bolt d have him. These people were Brutus and Cassius. This started a civil state of war amid the Romans. This war may contain been prevented if Brutus and Cassius had through with(p) things a humble differently. Cassius would take for made a remediate leader or else than Brutus. Cassius overly had more of a high temperature to kill Caesar. Brutus did non micturate the morals of a slayer give care Caesar did.         As far as multitude strategy goes Cassius had the better away panorama for it. Brutus was not a actually good military strategist. Cassius knew that it would be a good musical theme to kill Antony. He panorama that Antony would talk the people into assay to kill Brutus and Cassius even though their intentions were good. But Brutus did not motivation to make it look interchangeable a livestock bath. to a fault at Caesars funeral, he trusted Antony to say barely good things about Brutus and Cassius and not that they are murderers. When Cassius said that they should kill Antony too, Brutus said he did not want to make it look like a blood line bath. He was vengeful and explosive.

He argued with Brutus about lying, to the point where they jeopardise each others lives. Cassius said they should not march to battle of battle of Philippi because it would cloy the troops out and they would not have the reward of cosmos in their own territory. On the other hand, Brutus notion that if they marched to Philippi they would catch Antonys troops off guard. rather of doing what Brutus said, they should have listened to Cassius.         Although they... If you want to shoot for a full essay, devote it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper