Miranda v. Arizona Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Miranda v. Arizona - Essay ExampleThe jury shew Miranda guilty of the kidnapping and rape charges, and a sentence of 20 to 30 years on all(prenominal) count was imposed on Miranda. Later, Miranda made an appeal to the imperious Court of Arizona, which held that the constitutional rights of Miranda had not been violate by the guard, at the time of procuring the confession. In this manner, the Supreme Court of Arizona upheld the decision of the lower lawcourt (MIRANDA V. ARIZONA AN OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION QUESTIONS).In this case, the Supreme Court examined the statements of the patrol officers and the confession obtained from Miranda. It held that the police officers had failed to intimate Miranda that he had a right to council. It was also found that the police had not given any opportunity to Miranda to suffice his right to council during the questioning. The Court stated that the police had failed to inform Miranda of his legitimate right to not to be compelled to incriminat e himself during the interrogation (Miranda v Arizona , 1966).Thus, the Supreme Court clearly held that in the absence of the fulfillment of these requirements, the statements procured from Miranda were inadmissible as evidence. The police should have followed the legal procedures, while obtaining evidence from Miranda, if it was to be admissible in the court. The Supreme Court held that the typed statement from Miranda that he had full knowledge of his constitutional rights, did not waive his constitutional rights (Case brief Of Miranda Vs. Arizona 1966).In addition, the Supreme Court during its ruling emphasized that the process of interrogation, by its very nature was always intimidating. This can be offset by reading suspects their rights, prior to the commencement of interrogation. It is the duty of the police officer to read out these rights to the suspect before the interrogation. However, there is no need for a police officer to read these rights to a suspect, while arrest ing the latter (Case Brief Of Miranda