Violation Early Childhood Code of Ethics Research Paper

Violation Early Childhood Code of morality - Research Paper ExampleSecondly, it also discusses some of the appropriate ways that could be taken to parry such a violation. One of the most challenging respectable issues while dealing with fryren is food. Ms. Devan, an early puerility study teacher was implicated in an ethical case whereby the parents argued that she went beyond her ethical boundaries by allowing children to use food as playing tools. Precisely, Ms. Devan was victimisation pudding as finger paint while educational activity children how to paint. According to her, they preferred using edible pudding as finger paint since they disc everywhereed that the children were position it on their mouth. Although there are ethical mandates demanding that the health of the children should be given the first priority, she preferred using food pudding since it was safer than finger paint (Swim & Freeman, 2008). Although her actions were well intentioned, so many ethical quest ions are brocaded from such an action. For instance, the children developed a habit of licking the pudding paint directly from the table. This is certainly non hygienic. However, it is better compared to swallowing the regular finger paint that is sold commercially. The ethical case came into the limelight when one of the childs mothers scolded her child for licking sandwich jelly that had spilled on the table at home. When she asked the child, the child sustain that their teacher let them do it at school. Certainly, the child had learned a different thing from what was ab initio intended. The parent was worried that the teacher was not exercising the children code of ethics. The teacher also failed to realize that children could confound learned that playing materials are good for consumption. This is certainly a violation of early puerility code of ethics, which demands that children be taught the right code of behavior especially during this important stage of cognitive devel opment. Actually, the parent was even off more worried that the teacher was wasting food while there were thousands of other children all over the world dying of hunger. Some of the ethical upholds raised from the situation demand a critical aspect and consideration. Was the teacher acting safe by allowing children to play with food? Was it safe for the children after all? Did the teacher think about other lessons learned in the process? So many questions of ethical concern chamberpot be raised from this case. Undeniably, there is no clear cut difference between what should be done or what should not be done. This is even made more complicated because of the differences in ethical values between different stakeholders. Early childhood codes of ethics may not suffice tolerable to handle such ethically complicated issues. According to National Association for the Education of Young Children, it is prerequisite To create and maintain safe and healthy settings that foster children s social, emotional, intellectual, and physical development and that respect their high-handedness and their contributions (2012). It is evident from the ethical principle that the teacher failed to maintain healthy settings, failed to consider the overall social development of the childrens behavior, as well as intellectual development. Needless to say, there are several measures that can be taken to avoid similar ethical violations. Firstly, the teachers need to expand their knowledge on childhood cognitive development. This would enable the teacher to make better decisions when choosing