lightweight truss construction

The purpose of this paper is to argue issues concerning the use of jackanapes truss expression. The use of this construction has increased greatly in recent years. There ar many benefits to use jackanapes truss constructions. However, there are as well dangers, which will be presented.The principal(prenominal) benefit of use lightweight truss wood construction is that it offers builders the probability to save lots of money (Pindelski, 2006). Construction companies are in the dividing line of making money, and therefore many of them prefer to use this new, cheaper construction. This allows the builders to secure more than contracts because they are able to offer lower prices. Another benefit of using lightweight truss construction is that it makes it easier to install and run utilities and ventilation systems, it is also easy to assemble. Moreover, this new construction is as strong as traditional structures under normal conditions (Pindelski, 2006).It is clear that there are indeed benefits to using lightweight truss construction, however, as with all types of construction, safety is a major concern. Research has demonstrated that lightweight truss construction does measure up to desired safety standards. For example, grow statistics suggest that there is an urgent motif for improved performance of light-weight truss construction in fire scenarios, (Ziemba, 2006, p.2).This creates a serious danger for relievers and state who occupy buildings, which have caught on fire. Buildings that demand lightweight wood truss construction are susceptible to decay from fire exposure in a very short meter of time, (Pindelski, 2006). This sentiment is further supported in the hold Lightweight hold fast May Cause Firefighter decease. Without training and building codes that specifically aim the fire hazards and threats caused by lightweight truss construction, many civilian and firefighter lives may be lost due to early structural take apart during fire situations, (Lightweight Truss May Cause Firefighter Death, 2005).Construction companies and builders are now left to decide if the benefits of using lightweight truss construction are worth the risks to homosexual lives. Firefighter argue that this construction is hardly too dangerous, and has cause death for many firefighters. Unfortunately, many builders to not tally and they assert that firefighters are simply misinformed and exaggerating the dangers of these construction materials. This debate is likely to move for years to come. But there is no doubt that most people agree that saving lives is more important than saving money. Using lightweight truss constructions is an unsafe practice and it is not worth the risk to human lives or safety.ReferencesLightweight Truss May Cause Firefighter Death (2005). Retrieved May 8, 2007, fromhttp//singularity.pilsch.com/Squad514CasualArgumentPindelski, J. (2006). Understanding the Dangers of Lightweight Truss Construction. Retrieved Ma y 8, 2007, fromhttp//cms.firehouse.com/content/article/article.jsp?id=46749§ionld=14Ziemba, G. (2006). Theoretical Analysis of Light-Weight Truss Construction in Fire Conditions, Including the Use of Fire Retardant Treated Wood. Retrieved May 8, 2007, from http//www.wpi.edu/Pubs/ETD/ on hand(predicate)/etd-050506-114556/unrestricted/Gziemba.pdf