Tuesday, February 5, 2019
An Analysis of Solipsism in Kantââ¬â¢s Critique of Pure Reason Essay
An Analysis of Solipsism in Kants Critique of delicate ReasonMy goal is to examine solipsism and discover how Immanuel Kants Transcendental Idealism could be subject to a charge of being solipsistic. Following this, I get out briefly review the destructive impact this charge would have on certain of Kants positions. After the case for solipsism is made, I intend to decipher a possible line of re besidestal from Kants perspective that could be made to the charge. The issue of solipsism is intriguing in that it seems to be universally rejected as a basis of metaphysics. Yet, the modern tradition has had difficulty reinforcement this rejection. Antony Flew defines solipsism as, The theory that I am the sole existent. To be a solipsist I must hold that I alone exist independently, and that what I ordinarily call the outside world exists nevertheless as an object or content of my consciousness (330). According to solipsism, I see the world by my eyes. The world is only as I see it. Reality is only that which seems real to me. Knowledge is what I know. Egoism is the ethic. Politics and social conditions do not concern me. My pain is the only pain. My welf be is the only concern. As Rene Descartes stated in the second meditation, the contents of his mind seemed to be instantaneously available to him. I am, however, a real thing, and really existent still what thing? The answer was, a thinking thing...since it is now manifest to me that bodies themselves ar not properly perceived by the senses nor by the faculty of imagination, but by the intellect alone and since they are not perceived because they are seen and touched, but only because they are understood or rightly comprehended by thought, I readily discover that there is ... ...he realm of appearances is sufficient to mention the necessity for rational beings to assume the existence of ones experience mind and other minds. Further, I believe from this basis one nates refuse to accept the possibility that Kants Transcendental Idealism could be reduced to solipsism.Works CitedDescartes, Rene. Meditations on the First Philosophy. The Rationalists. New York Doubleday, 1960. 121-127.Flew, Antony. A Dictionary of Philosophy. New York St. Martins Press, 1979. 330.Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Practical Reason. Trans. Lewis White Beck. Upper gable roof River, NJ Prentice Hall, 1993. 141-149.Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. Norman Kemp Smith. New York St. Martins Press, 1929. Kant, Immanuel. perfect Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. T. K. Abbott. Buffalo, NY Prometheus Books, 1988.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment