Perfection in Pride and Prejudice

It is a the true universally acknowledged that a single man in possession of a easily fortune must be in want of a wife.\n superbia and prepossession\n\n therefrom begins one of the most noteworthy freshs of all times, Jane Austens Pride and Prejudice. Ostensibly, the novel revolves most the heterogeneous romances and relationships of the bennet sisters with the numerous hands they meet in and around the little village of Meryton. underneath the superficially frivolous written report of the novel lies an sentiment further more profound an root word that has fascinated and eluded story-tellers, poets and painters throughout the ages the idea of correct femininity.\nPride and Prejudice is a novel by a woman, written for and nigh women. It is full of female characters, the grave and the bad, the smart and the stupid. The lives and times, joys and sorrows, vices and virtues of these women fill the pages of Austens masterpiece, painting a realise more realistic and we ll-favoured than each modern photograph.\nYet, by the end of the novel, we are leftover with one question which of these women is the topper of all? Which of them should be held up as the role precedent for all young women to engage? Who represents everlasting(a) womanhood?\nThe conceit of perfect womanhood, and by reference perfect manhood, in combine forming natures perfect pairing, has been the subject of art and doctrine since times immemorial. In Hinduism the idea of Ardhanarishwar can be seen as the perfect conjoining of man and woman. cristal and Eve of Christianity represent the Abrahamic rarified of perfect gender roles.\nIn Pride and Prejudice, there develop been two main candidates for perfect womanhood, Jane and Elizabeth, the two eldest Bennet girls. Many critics have seen in Jane the ideal of Regency womanhood sweetly and agreeable and most importantly, submissive. I do not think, however, that Jane Austen had any intention of holding Jane up as an ideal. On the contrary, the novel is full of instances...